| PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT IN SURVEYING EDUCATION |
By
Professor John R Parker
Surveyor General (Retired)
Chair FIG Commission 1
PO Box 110,
Brunswick East
Victoria 3057
Australia
Email: park106@attglobal.net
Ph: 61 3 9387 1964
Abstract
It is important for students
to have an understanding of the functions and responsibilities
of a geomatics professional, and particularly professional
surveyors and geomatics engineers, in the community. To have
a good grounding in ethics, codes of conduct and customer
service, which has been reinforced by example from members
of the profession is fundamental to developing a “professional”
surveyor.
Introduction
As a result of the dramatic
growth in technology there is a need to distinguish between
technical excellence and professional practice. What constitutes
a professional? There are a range of definitions, but put
simply it is putting others needs before your own. As has
also been said ‘nothing distinguishes the professional
from the businessman more than the reliance on ethics in fulfilling
his commitment to colleagues, employers, clients and society
as a whole. Where the businessman’s creed is profit,
products, people and principle – in that order –
the professional must exactly reverse the order and importance
of these four criteria’. (Allred 1994).
The dictionary definition
of “development” is ‘the process of growing
or developing’. “Develop” has a definition
of ‘to grow or bring to a later, more elaborate, or
more advanced stage’ (Collins).
Therefore to ensure there
is ‘professional development’ there is a need
to grow the individual particularly in their principles and
regard for people.
Technology has offered
new opportunities and new challenges, but has not changed
the underlying need for an ethical approach to the work of
the surveyor. ‘There is a need to enforce an ethical
code that seeks to balance legitimate commercial interests
with third party rights’ (Dale).
‘The foundations
of understanding of professional responsibility must be established
early in the individuals career, preferably commencing in
the professional school. These responsibilities should be
regularly reinforced in practice, … Textural discussion,
clear and specific descriptions (using examples) of both ethical
and unethical behavior, and providing support programmes to
help practitioners resolve their personal, professional or
commercial difficulties are some of the strategies that need
to be considered’ (Hoogsteden 1999).
The challenge for educators
is to assist their students and the professions generally
to develop as professionals.
The Youthful
Years
Children start learning
what is ‘right’ and what is ‘wrong’
from very early in life. They learn to provide and receive
a service from parents, particularly in their early years
(parents are customers as are the children). What is learnt
in those early years, particularly through example, through
observing and often through discipline is a great start, but
more formal methods of learning, through instruction (teaching)
is required in later years. As they develop towards a more
formal working life, there is a need to be exposed to more
explicit examples and/or mentors that are related to their
likely career.
The Tertiary
Education Years
By the time University
is reached future career directions are largely known. Depending
on the chosen career, there is a need by the end of the course,
for students to not only have a good understanding of the
theory of the chosen discipline, but also a practical understanding,
and particularly to know how to behave as a “professional”
– to know right from wrong in the more subtle ways of
a professional, to understand societies needs, to understand
customer/client needs and how to provide a quality service.
It is therefore important
prior to the students graduating for them to be exposed to
the theory of professionalism, in particular - ethics;
- codes of conduct;
- quality customer
service; and
- the role of professional
societies.
As observed by McNaughton
in 1988, ‘… no training course in a profession
is complete without a course on practical ethics and moral
theory’ (Hoogsteden 1999).
‘The experience
and skills of the instructor are important factors and it
is preferable for a teacher to have a sound understanding
of the actual practice of surveying together with sufficient
education and training in ethical theory and practice. The
educators should see themselves primarily as facilitators
– impressing a particular attitude on students is little
short of indoctrination if it is not accompanied by rigorous,
objective reasoning. Ideally as Rosen and Caplan (1980) explain,
students should be enabled to “… reason and reach
decisions about moral problems and normative ethical theories
without the aid of the teacher” (Hoogsteden 1994).
An approach that can
be used to have students (in fact all members of the profession)
test their principles and actions is:
‘ – What would happen if everyone acted this way?
- What are the consequences of my actions for all people?
- Would I want someone else to act this way for me?
- Could my conduct stand up to fully informed public
scrutiny?’ (Allred 1998).
A key mechanism in ‘professional
development’ is example. Lecturers, particularly guest
lecturers from the profession need to demonstrate and exhibit
the attributes of a professional as part of the learning process
for the student.
To support the ideal
of service, the principles of total quality management need
to be understood by students. ‘The development of a
total quality culture throughout the surveying profession
should be actively encouraged to promote the principles of
best practice and customer service to ensure the future of
the surveying industry’. (Parker 1997). In simple terms
we need to ensure we “get it right first time, every
time”. (Parker 1997A)
The understanding and
development of a customer service commitment charter needs
to be encouraged as this supports the practical implementation
of professional development. The concept of ‘customers
first’, whether they be internal or external customers,
is an ideal mission. Surveyors are often in a unique situation,
having a number of customers/clients for the same service,
e.g. a cadastral survey can include the:
| |
- customer who pays the cost of the survey (often the
land owner); |
| |
- government who sets the standards and registers the
survey and/or the plan; |
| |
- public who require the integrity of the land tenure
system to be maintained or in some cases improved. |
Objectives of a “customer
service” charter could include;
- ‘aim to get it right first time, every time;
- meet customer needs and exceed their expectations;
- accept ownership of customer concerns;
- seek continuous improvements;
- actively negotiate solutions;
- work in partnership with our customers.’
The resultant “service
commitment” being that customers can expect:
| |
- ‘timely, accurate and professional service; |
| |
- innovative, flexible and practical solutions; |
| |
- honesty and integrity; |
| |
- open and effective communication.’ (Department
of Treasury and Finance 1995). |
The encouragement of students to join and actively participate
in a professional society or association is to be actively
encouraged.
Many surveying professional
societies have a student classification, which offer a much
reduced annual subscription, in some cases, no subscription
is payable. The Institution of Surveyors, Australia not only
encourages students to become members, but also supports a
Young Surveyors Group. The opportunity to mix with the older
members of the profession assists in gaining a practical understanding
of the responsibilities of a professional.
FIG – The
International Federation of Surveyors
FIG was founded in 1878
in Paris. It is a federation of national associations and
is the only international body that represents all surveying
disciplines. It is an UN-recognised non government organisation
(NGO) and its aim is to ensure that the disciplines of surveying
and all who practise them meet the needs of the markets and
communities that they serve. It realises its aim by promoting
the practice of the profession and encouraging the development
of professional standards.
FIG’s activities
are governed by a plan of work, which is regularly reviewed
against a longer-term strategic plan. The current plan of
work focuses on the surveyor’s response to social, economic,
technological and environmental change and the particular
needs of countries in economic transition. FIG also recognises
that markets for surveyors’ services are constantly
changing. The plan accordingly lays emphasis on strengthening
professional institutions; promoting professional development;
and encouraging surveyors to acquire new skills and techniques
so that they may be properly equipped to meet the needs of
society and the environment.
Commissions lead FIG’s
technical work. Its congresses, working weeks, seminars, symposiums
and workshops all support the activities of the commissions
and FIG.
The FIG home page (http://www.FIG.net)
is a key mechanism for communication. FIG produces a number
of publications to assist surveyors and their clients. These
include, ‘Continuing Professional Development’
publication No. 15, (FIG 1996), ‘Constituting Professional
Associations’ publication No. 16, (FIG 1998) and ‘Statement
of Ethical Principles and Model Code of Professional Conduct’
publication No. 17, (FIG 1998A). FIG has adopted a ‘Charter
of Quality’ which will be incorporated into a future
publication.
The charter, in which
its members recognise and agree to undertake, is:
| * |
To commit our respective organisations
and member associations to quality, service and client/customer
satisfaction; |
| * |
To develop a total quality culture
through management commitment and leadership within
our organisations; |
| * |
To develop a continuous improvement
approach to all our activities; |
| * |
To work towards achieving recognition
of our respective organisations to international recognised
standards for quality systems; |
| * |
To encourage the suppliers of products
and services to surveyors to embrace the principles
of the quality movement; |
| * |
To train surveyors through a total
quality approach; |
| * |
To share and participate in benchmarking
and performance measurement.” (Parker 2000).S |
As set out in the publication
‘Constituting Professional Associations’ there
are four reasons for forming a professional body - to unify
the profession;
- to provide continuing professional development;
- to act on behalf of the profession; and,
- to contribute to society’s well
being.
Eight common functions are behind the formation and operation
of any professional association. These are networking, representing,
promoting, educating, setting standards, producing products
and services, providing professional and technical advice,
and financing and funding.
The FIG web site contains
the full text of ‘Constituting Professional Associations’.
Of relevance, where a professional association can provide
benefits are:
‘Education’ – professional associations
have a responsibility to work with relevant academic institutions
to ensure the professional courses being offered in their
countries meet the needs of the profession and equip graduates
with relevant knowledge. Professional associations also work
closely with employers to ensure graduates obtain the practical
training and experience that are essential components of a
professional qualification. In the case of surveying where
there are no relevant courses at university level, FIG will
support the local association in seeking to have these established.
‘Setting Standards’ – Standards should cover
a range of matters including:
| * |
Standards of ethical behavior to
be adhered to when dealing with clients, other members
of the profession and the public; |
| * |
Standards of performance in the
conduct of work of individuals and firms; |
| * |
Standards of education and training
necessary for those who would enter the profession and
practise in it; and |
| * |
Standards of continuing professional
development so that those who do practise in the profession
may keep their knowledge up to date. |
‘Products and Services’
– Assists its members to understand how to deliver their
goods and services in a way which will be best for their clients
and the community, e.g. Understanding the principles and fundamentals
of quality.
‘Profession and Technical Advice’ – acts
as a conduit in supplying professional and technical advice
or assistance to those within its membership, to the clients
of their services, and to all outside the profession who need
it.
FIG is aware that cultures,
political systems, awareness and understanding of professional
practice differ from nation to nation, but there are certain
fundamental principles that should apply to all. Whilst it
is the responsibility of national professional bodies to set
standards for professional conduct the Statement of Ethical
Principles and Model Code of Professional Conduct identifies
the key issues that should be understood by students.
Attachment 1 is a copy
of FIG publication No. 17, ‘Statement of Ethical Principles
and Model Code of Professional Conduct’ which provides
detail on the four ethical principles of integrity, independence,
care and competence and duty. These principles will need to
be considered in relation to a number of roles of the surveyor:
| * |
As an employer |
| * |
As a supplier |
| * |
As a professional adviser |
| * |
As a member of professional body |
| * |
As a business practitioner |
| * |
As a manager of a range of resources. |
Students need to be aware
of the importance of Continuing Professional Development (CPD).
CPD is a key method by which individual members of the surveying
profession can maintain and develop their skill base and so
ensure that are able to provide the most appropriate technical
or professional solution to problems. FIG through its publication
No. 15, ‘Continuing Professional Development’
(available on the FIG web site) is a useful resource document
on this subject.
How
Much of developing “professionalism”
is an ongoing process; being reinforced throughout the tertiary
years of an University course, by theory, by example and in
every day customer/service provider relationships (teacher/student
or student/teacher relationships). There is value in supplementing
this with exposing students to a range of guest lecturers
on a range of topics, but particularly from the profession
on issues of “professionalism”. For example the
Department of Geomatics, University of Melbourne, has a subject
titled “Professional Development 3” in its final
year, which has a series of guest lecturers, mainly being
practitioners in the survey profession, who discuss:
| - |
the functions and responsibilities
of the professional surveyor and engineer, and the geomatics
practitioner within the community; |
- |
professional ethics and codes of
conduct; |
- |
the role of the government, private
and academic sectors in the geomatics and spatial information
industry; |
- |
strategic planning; |
- |
total quality management and quality
assurance; and |
- |
professional societies. |
with the operation and
management of a surveying practice is compulsory for all students.
Students are also required to review an organisation, prepare
a report on the organisation and make a presentation of that
report. (Melbourne University 2000)
The Department of Surveying
at the University of Otago in New Zealand has within its course
curriculum a subject of ‘Professional Practice’,
which includes in its contents:
| - |
The origins, structures and future
of professions; |
- |
Surveyor-client, surveyor-society
and surveyor-surveyor relationships; |
- |
Professional ethics; |
- |
Professional negligence and liability; |
- |
Practice management for the professional
surveyor; |
- |
Personnel management and human
resources; |
| - |
Functions and processes of financial and management
accounting; |
| - |
The professional marketplace and professional marketing; |
| - |
Project management; |
| - |
Professional surveyors in central and local government;
and, |
| - |
Professional communication. |
Ethical dilemmas can
confront us at any time. A useful technique, to ensure that
the discussion is grounded in reality rather than vague principles,
is to use examples as the basis for the discussion. A variety
of examples have been created for this purpose; they should,
for best effect, be tailored to the circumstances of the organisation
and the individuals in it, drawing on real experiences that
people have encountered. The FIG Commission 1 Working Group
on Business Practices created three dilemmas as part of its
work; they produced a range of responses from professional
surveyors around the world. They are reproduced here as a
starting point in creation of such dilemmas:
| * |
Whilst undertaking a site survey
for a private sector client, it becomes apparent to
you that the client intends to ignore potentially serious
environmental impacts of the development of the site.
You reflect on your obligations to your client and to
the community. What do you do? |
| * |
As a partner in a firm of surveyors,
you have successfully won a tender for some work in
a country where bribes are considered a normal part
of doing business. In your own country, bribes are illegal
(or, at the very least, not accepted practice). Will
you use bribes to get the project completed successfully? |
| * |
You have successfully tendered
for a survey. Other work means that you cannot complete
the work by the required date, so you subcontract the
work to another surveyor who only charges you a small
fraction of the fee you have agreed with the client.
What do you charge the client? |
Conclusion
It is important to demonstrate
“professionalism” in all activities so that clients
and the community recognise the surveyor as a person worthy
of being called a professional. This professional surveyor
is one that can be trusted, has integrity, cares for others
and cares for the environment.
Professional development
needs to commence with students as they commence their university
studies. It needs to be a key component of any undergraduate
course in geomatics or surveying.
The importance of setting
the right example or demonstrating the correct behavior is
the responsibility of all, but in particular for those who
can influence or do interact with the students.
References
Allred, G.K. (1994),
The Land Surveyor as a Public Officer, FIG XX Congress Proceedings
Vol. 102.2, Melbourne, Australia.
Allred, G.K. (Ken), (1998),
Ethics for the Global Surveying Community, FIG XX1 Congress
Proceedings Vol. 1 pp36-51, Brighton, Great Britain.
Collins (1990), The Collins
Paperback English Dictionary, William Collins Sons & Co.
Ltd., Glasgow.
Dale, Peter (1994), Professionals
and Ethics – a Guide for Surveyors, FIG XX Congress
Proceedings Vol. 103.2, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Treasury
and Finance (1995), Customer Service Commitment Charter –
Office of the Surveyor General and Office of Geographic Data
Co-ordination, Government of Victoria, Australia.
FIG (1996), Continuing
Professional Development, FIG Publication No. 15, United Kingdom.
FIG (1998), Constituting
Professional Associations, FIG Publication No. 16, United
Kingdom.
FIG (1998A), Statement
of Ethical Principles and Model Code of Professional Conduct,
FIG Publication No. 17, United Kingdom.
FIG (2000), Information
2000, FIG, Denmark.
Hoogsteden, C.C. (1994),
Ethics Education for Tomorrows Professional Surveyors, FIG
XX Congress Proceedings Vol. 202.3, Melbourne, Australia.
Hoogsteden, Chris (1999),
Applying Discipline and Enhancing Ethical Behaviour in Modern
Professional Surveying, Survey Quarterly, Issue 18 June 1999,
ISNZ, New Zealand.
Melbourne University
(2000), Professional Development 3, Course Syllabus, Department
of Geomatics, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Parker, John R. (1997),
Quality Systems in Professional Practice, FIG Working Week,
Singapore.
Parker, John (1997A),
The Role of Quality Assurance in the Surveying Industry Within
Australia, Ikusasa, Durban, South Africa.
Parker, Prof. John (2000),
Quality Awards and Surveyors, FIG Working Week, Prague, Czech
Republic.
Robillard, Walter G.
(1994), The Foundation of the Professions and the Professionals,
FIG XX Congress Proceedings Vol. 105.2, Melbourne, Australia.
Rosen, B., Caplan, A.L.
(1980), Ethics in the Undergraduate Curriculum, Institute
of Society, Ethics and Life Sciences, New York, USA.
BIOGRAPHICAL
NOTES
Professor John Parker
is currently chair of FIG Commission 1 (Professional Standards
and Practice). He provides consulting services to the World
Bank, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation
and various governments including the Victorian State Government
where he was Registrar of Geographic Names from 1998 to 2000.
From 1989 to 1998 John was Surveyor General for Victoria.
Prior to that he worked for a state instrumentality and was
in private practice for 19 years.
He is a member of a number
of societies, including the Institution of Surveyors, Australia.
A number of papers have been published and presentations made
at national and international forums on a range of themes
including quality.
Professor Parker is an
Adjunct Professor with the Department of Linguistics, Macquarie
University, Sydney and an Associate Professor with the Department
of Geomatics, University of Melbourne.
ATTACHMENT 1
FIG PUBLICATION No 17
Statement of Ethical Principles and Model Code of Professional
Conduct
FIG STATEMENT
OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
and
MODEL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Contents
Preface
Background
Statement of Ethical Principles
The Public Interest
Model Code of Professional Conduct
Orders of Printed Versions
Preface
The International Federation
of Surveyors (FIG) is a UN -accredited non-government organisation
which represents the interests of surveyors throughout the
world. Those who belong to its member associations work in
government, in the corporate sector and in the private sector,
as practitioners, academics or researchers. All seek the highest
standards of professional and technical in the delivery of
their services.
One consequence of globalisation
and the opening up of markets to foreign participation is
the need for professional and ethical standards that apply
to all. This is to ensure fair competition, to build and retain
the confidence of clients, to protect the environment within
which we all live, and to respect the interests of third parties.
Whereas cultures, political
systems, awareness and understanding of professional practice
differ from nation to nation, there are certain fundamental
principles that, in the view of FIG, should apply to all.
Whilst it is the responsibility of national professional bodies
to set local standards for professional conduct, FIG has sought
to help its members by preparing the following statement of
ethical principles and model code of professional conduct
which between identify the key issues that need to be included
in any national code.
On behalf of FIG I would
like to thank Ken Allred and those colleagues who worked with
him on the preparation of this document. Together with the
FIG companion publications on constituting professional associations
and on continuing professional development, it will help all
that practice the disciplines of surveying to meet the needs
of the markets and the communities that they serve.
Professor Peter Dale
President, FIG
Background
1.The
surveying profession is recognised globally as one that adheres
to fundamental ethical principles.
2.The International
Federation of Surveyors (FIG) recognises that, due to international
differences of culture, language, and legal and social systems,
the task of preparing a detailed code of professional conduct
must rest with each member association, which also has the
responsibility to implement and enforce such a code.
3.FIG also recognises
that, given the global mobility of surveyors, it is important
to establish common ethical principles and codes of professional
conduct. As part of its role in providing guidance and encouraging
the harmonisation of standards, FIG offers this model code.
4.A professional
is distinguished by certain characteristics including:
| * |
mastery of a particular
intellectual skill, acquired by education and training; |
| * |
acceptance of duties to society
in addition to duties to clients and employers; |
| * |
an outlook that is essentially
objective; and |
| * |
the rendering of personal service
to a high standard of conduct and performance. |
5.Professional
surveyors recognise that their ethical responsibilities extend
to the public, to their clients and employers, to their peers
and to their employees. Accordingly they acknowledge the need
for integrity, independence, care and competence, and a sense
of duty. They uphold and advance these values by:
| * |
supporting and participating in the continuing
development of the surveying profession; |
| * |
serving with honesty and forthrightness and within areas
of their competence; and |
| * |
using their expertise for the enhancement of society
and the stewardship of resources. |
6.FIG recommends
that surveyors and associations of surveyors adopt the following
ethical principles and model codes of professional conduct
or, where appropriate, adapt them to local values and customs.
Ethical
Principles
Integrity
Surveyors
| * |
maintain the highest
standards of honesty and integrity towards those with
whom they come into contact, either directly or indirectly;
and
|
| * |
accurately and conscientiously
measure, record and interpret all data and offer impartial
advice based thereon.
|
Independence
Surveyors
| * |
diligently and faithfully
execute their role according to the law; and
|
| * |
maintain their objectivity and
give their clients and employers unbiased advice, without
prejudice or favour either towards or against other
organisations or persons.
|
Care and competence
Surveyors
| * |
maintain their knowledge
and skills, keep abreast of developments in their fields
of practice and apply their expertise for the benefit
of society;
|
| * |
only take on work that they reasonably
believe they will be able to carry out in a professional
manner; and |
| * |
exercise care in the performance
of their duties.
|
Duty
Surveyors
| * |
maintain confidentiality
about the affairs of their current and former clients
and employers unless required by law to make disclosures;
|
| * |
avoid conflicts of interest; |
| * |
take environmental concerns into
account in their operations and activities; |
| * |
recognise the interests of the
public when providing services to their clients or employers;
and |
| * |
conduct their work to the best
of their ability, giving due consideration to the rights
of all parties. |
The Public Interest
1.The first duty of
surveyors is normally to their clients or employers but as
professionals they also have a duty to the public. Surveyors
are fact finders and providers of opinions and advice. It
is important that they are diligent, competent, impartial
and of unquestionable integrity in ensuring that the information
they provide is true and complete and that the opinions and
advice that they give are of the highest quality.
2.The work of surveyors
has cumulative and long-term effects on future generations.
Many of the functions of surveyors, even those performed for
private clients, are by their nature functions that have a
lasting impact on society. Most information becomes public
information at some point in time and may be used for purposes
other than those for which it was initially intended. The
information recorded by early surveyors and explorers has,
for example, subsequently been used for the expansion of geographical
knowledge and for land development. Similarly, land management
systems designed for today create an environment in which
future generations will live, work and play. The principles
of sustainable development require surveyors to work as much
for the future as for the present.
3.Clients, employers
and the public must be confident that surveyors have exercised
objectivity in arriving at their professional opinions. These
obligations may sometimes appear to be in conflict with the
obligations that surveyors owe to their clients, their employers
and their peers. Surveyors have a duty to the truth, even
when it may not be in the best interest of their clients or
employers.
4.All surveyors, whether
they be private practitioners, employees in the private sector,
public servants or educators, should discharge their professional
duties and adhere to ethical principles in accordance with
the following model code of professional conduct.
Model Code of
Professional Conduct
FIG recommends the following
code of conduct as the minimum to be expected of all professional
surveyors.
1. In general,
surveyors
| * |
exercise unbiased
independent professional judgement; |
| * |
act competently and do not accept
assignments that are outside the scope of their professional
competence;
|
| * |
advance their knowledge and skills
by participating in relevant programmes of continuing
professional development;
|
| * |
ensure that they understand the
fundamental principles involved when working in new
areas of expertise, conducting thorough research and
consulting with other experts as appropriate; and |
| * |
do not accept assignments that
are beyond their resources to complete in a reasonable
time and in a professional manner.
|
2. As employers,
surveyors:
| * |
assume responsibility
for all work carried out by their professional and non-professional
staff; |
| * |
assist their employees to achieve
their optimum levels of technical or professional advancement; |
| * |
ensure that their employees have
proper working conditions and equitable remuneration;
and |
| * |
cultivate in their employee’s
integrity and an understanding of the professional obligations
of urveyors to society. |
3. When dealing
with clients, surveyors:
* |
avoid any appearance
of professional impropriety; |
* |
disclose any potential conflicts
of interest, affiliations or prior involvement that
could affect the quality of service to be provided;
|
* |
avoid associating with any persons
or enterprises of doubtful character; |
* |
do not receive remuneration for
one project from multiple sources without the knowledge
of the parties involved;
|
|
* |
preserve the confidences and regard
as privileged all information about their clients’
affairs; and |
|
* |
maintain confidentiality during
as well as after the completion of their service. |
4. When providing
professional services, surveyors:
* |
seek remuneration commensurate
with the technical complexity, level of responsibility
and liability for the services rendered; |
* |
make no fraudulent charges for
services rendered; |
* |
provide details on the determination
of remuneration at the request of their clients; and
|
|
* |
do not sign certificates, reports
or plans unless these were prepared and completed under
their personal supervision. |
5. As members
of a professional association, surveyors:
* |
do not enter into
arrangements that would enable unqualified persons to
practice as if they were professionally qualified;
|
* |
report any unauthorised practice
to the governing body of the profession; |
* |
refuse to advance the application
for professional status of any person known to be unqualified
by
education, experience or character; and
|
|
* |
promote the surveying profession
to clients and the public. |
6. As business
practitioners, surveyors:
* |
do not make false
or misleading statements in advertising or other marketing
media; |
* |
do not, either directly or indirectly,
act to undermine the reputation or business prospects
of other surveyors;
|
* |
do not supplant other surveyors
under agreement with their clients; and |
| * |
do not establish branch offices
that purport to be under the direction and management
of a responsible professional surveyor unless this is
actually the case.
|
7. As resource
managers, surveyors:
* |
approach environmental
concerns with perception, diligence and integrity; |
|
* |
· develop and maintain a
reasonable level of understanding of environmental issues
and the principles of sustainable development;
|
* |
bring any matter of concern relating
to the physical environment and sustainable development
to the attention of their clients or employers;
|
| * |
employ the expertise of others
when their knowledge and ability are inadequate for
addressing specific environmental issues;
|
| * |
include the costs of environmental
protection and remediation among the essential factors
used forsi project evaluation;
|
| * |
ensure that environmental assessment,
planning and management are integrated into projects
that are likely to impact on the environment; and
|
| * |
encourage additional environmental
protection when the benefits to society justify the
costs. |
FIG PUBLICATION No 17
Statement of Ethical
Principles and Model Code of Professional Conduct
Published in English
Published by
The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG)
FIG Bureau 1996 - 1999
ISBN: 0-85406-921-6
September 1998
London, UK
Printed copies can be
ordered from:
FIG Office
Lindevangs Allé 4
DK-2000 Frederiksberg
DENMARK
Tel: + 45 38 86 10 81
Fax: + 45 38 86 02 52
Email: FIG@ddl.org
Bajar
texto (Tamaño
20KB)
|