| THE
NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND SURVEYING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION |
AUTHORS:
(*)School of Surveying
– School of Exact Sciences, Engineering and Surveying
– National University of Rosario – Av. Pellegrini
250 (2000) - Rosario - Argentina
ABSTRACT:
The technological changes mankind
has achieved at the end of the Century have improved Surveying.
State-of-the art technologies contribute rapidity, security
and economy to the professional work of Surveyors. It is essential
to incorporate this into university education.
Topography
has to be thought as vectorial, resulting primarily in spatial
coordinates. The choice of methods and instruments must be
based on precision, incorporating the idea of geo-referencing.
Satellite
technology has provided Geodesy with the unique chance of
a worldwide reference system. However, height problems relate
to the study of geoids. Calculation is not a limitation any
more.
We
need time and effort to provide for change in professional
practical applications, together with deeper knowledge.
We
think of education as an ongoing process that extends into
post-graduate studies. We also believe research is crucial
to development.
INTRODUCTION:
The second half of the XXth
century witnessed crucial technological changes. Particularly,
electronics and informatics have suffered a qualitative leap
that has greatly impacted on science. It has been a true Technological
Revolution.
This
revolution has been so wide and significant that it has impacted
on the whole of human activities. Man is still the same, human
desires and conflicts have not changed. However, the way human
beings perform their activities has notoriously been modified.
The how of human activities is notoriously different.
Just
to mention some examples: communications change almost every
day, at a very fast pace. So do activities as dissimilar as
war and economic output. Our every day life, both as individuals
and as a social group suffer incessant modifications.
Surveying,
a professional activity that captures, manages and produces
territorial data and information for different purposes (legal,
cadastral, building, planning, cartographic purposes, etc.),
has not only been greatly impacted by these technological
advances but also has significantly improved and transformed
its capabilities.
This paper aims at explaining
at least some of the contributions that the new technologies
have provided both to Surveying and to the university education
of it.
Our
first conclusion is, undoubtedly, that the new technologies
have created very powerful tools for capturing, managing,
processing and producing territorial information. These tools
have profoundly modified the professional work since they
have contributed rapidity, safety and economy of efforts.
Many traditional, long-standing techniques have been quickly
and successfully overcome. New ways of measuring, processing
and representing information have been established.
Our
second conclusion derives from the foregoing. It is essential
to incorporate the new technologies and the tools these technologies
have created into university education. The different schools
of Surveying have been implementing this curricular change
to a greater or to a lesser extent, quite successfully.
So,
is this it? Or, is there a third and missing conclusion?
It
is a well-known fact that time and effort is needed to move
from a successful scientific research to the actual application
and resulting technology. Likewise, time and efforts are needed
to allow this new technology result in professional practical
applications based on sound, proven expertise.
We
have heard of total stations being used as a theodolite with
coupled distance meter. Or a GPS being used to determine the
shape and dimensions of rural polygons, with no adequate link
to a general reference system.
Achieving
the general and adequate application of a new technology requires
education. If education is properly implemented, this transition
will be faster.
A
change in the professional culture is required, not only in
the tools that allow this new culture to exist.
We
would like here not to state a third conclusion, but to make
a question, instead: Which are the new concepts to be taught?
Which are or should be their consequences when applied to
surveying university education?
It is, as it should, an ambitious
question. We are fully aware that our attempt to answer this
question will be partial and will of course reveal both our
expertise and limitations. We simply aim at making a contribution
to a global answer that, we believe, requires great expertise.
The
following are, in our opinion, some of the main technological
and conceptual changes to be considered:
| - |
As regards data processing: the
change has been such that it seems anything is possible,
that practical applications have no limitations. |
| - |
As regards communication capabilities:
linking and coordination capabilities are huge; limitations
relate only to certain operations that are performed
in real time. |
| - |
As regards geo-referencing: it
is at last practically feasible to reference all data
to a single worldwide system. This, besides allowing
a bi-univocal correspondence between a point and its
coordinates, also allows correlating spatial information
of any kind and source. |
| - |
As regards physical magnitudes
measurements: they can be extraordinary fast and precise |
| - |
As regards satellite technology:
it is probably the most notorious and recent contribution.
It has revolutionarised communications, positioning,
and image managing systems. Limitations are more linked
to military and strategical reasons than to technology
capability. |
| - |
As regards graphic representations:
graphic representations only miss the artist handprint.
By graphic representation we mean any image that could
be seen or represented using different tools. |
These technological and conceptual
changes materialize in practical tools. We have now different
software for calculation and graphic imaging, some very basic,
some very complex. We have now modern measurement instruments,
such as the total station and the GPS receptor. Communication
satellites with image capturing systems, atmospheric measurement
systems, with powerful software to manage, process and analyze
information, such as GIS, and, of course, a whole set of tools
that if properly linked to method and expertise result in
the successful application of the technologies we have mentioned.
We
may even benefit from another idea, another thinking. These
transformations provide for a huge improvement of surveying
in all of its traditional applications and may also be the
grounds for completely new applications.
What do we have to change in
university education?
First,
let us mention informatics and electronics.
We
believe informatics is to be given a key role. We
have to aim at training skillful users who can also make a
clever use of available resources. We have to aim at users
able of critical analysis based on their own knowledge and
practical experience. A good professional may adapt his methodology
to the available informatics resource. However, a professional
should never passively subdue to technology or he would be
jeopardizing his work. Informatics is to be thought of as
a tool. We are to know it in order to handle it in our own
benefit.
As
regards electronics, our approach is different. We
believe students need to have a general, basic knowledge of
Physics. It is of course true that most our tools and instruments
are electronic and will make further use of electronic advances.
However, going “deep” into electronics requires
a specialized education unrelated to surveying. We do not
mean we have to disregard or be ignorant of how to control,
assess and eventually calibrate and /or verify our measurement
instruments. It is possible to assess precision, corrections,
and accuracy by proper reading of measurement results.
There
are of course some changes we have to foster in traditional
and new disciplines. For instance, Photogrammety or Cartography
were activities reserved to big, well-funded institutions
or ample professional teams. Nowadays, university education
can train professionals able to produce photogrammetry and
cartography by making use of tools that small or medium size
university schools can have access to.
It
is necessary to introduce remote sensing to surveying university
education. Students should also be trained as excellent producers
of GIS basic layers and to provide consultancy on GIS implementation.
We have only mentioned these
disciplines but have not gone deep into them, so as not to
be partial or restrictive. We do pretend to analyze more in
depth other disciplines we believe are more related to our
experience as university professors.
We
refer to Topography and Geodesy.
It
may be worth stating that by Topography we mean everything
that is necessary to survey and/or draw any portion of the
Earth surface with enough detail and including natural and
cultural accidents. By Geodesy, on the other hand, we mean
the tasks that are necessary to build networks of points that
will support detailed surveys while, at the same time, will
follow the global aim of determining the shape and dimension
of the Earth.
We briefly state some suggestions
we believe are worth consideration:
Topography
The
traditional technology treated planimetry and altimetry as
separate entities. Besides, precision was based on the scale
of representation, since the product was basically a graphic
product, just like a calculation. Many of these concepts still
exist in the literature.
Nowadays,
the essential field instruments are the total station and
the GPS. In both cases, determination is spatial; either by
coordinate differences in a GPS or by distances and angles
in a total station. In short, we are measuring vectors.
We
have to think in a vectorial topography which primary result
is a set of spatial coordinates. This information is basically
expressed as a digital terrain model. Consequently, precision
is the starting point for method and instrument determination.
Scale or scales are decisions to be made afterwards, in accordance
with the use to be made of the information.
We
have to introduce and incorporate the idea —as well
as the theory and practical fundamentals — that topography
is the means to achieve geo-referenciation. Topography links
the element subject to the measurement to the referencing
framework provided by geodesy.
It
is not in the least our intention to deny proven and widely
used techniques no matter how old they are, since they have
to be supported and respected. We simply mean to cleverly
introduce them and integrate them with more modern techniques.
A
subject that has always deserved the most traditional respect
in Topography education is instrument handling and managing.
Instruments design varies at a fast pace, so do their capabilities
and precision. It is no longer possible to “train”
students in the use of all instruments. Education has to insist
and deepen on the fundamentals of measurement, such as theory
of errors, electronic measurement of distances, and, in general,
ample information on instruments feasible and present developments.
We
have to live through a contradiction: intense, constant drills
with instruments that we know are, in many cases, obsolete
mostly in Argentinean university schools, always short of
proper funding.
Geodesy
Satellite
technology has provided a remarkable development to geodesy.
We
can at last have a single worldwide referencing system. Geodesy
nowadays provides the necessary referencing framework to geo-reference
all human activities in relation to terrestrial space.
Satellite
geodesy has become essential in surveying university teaching.
At
the same time, while they have always been part of geodesy
education, the following topics regain significance: referencing
systems, translation of coordinates between different systems
and mathematical approaches in order to obtain plane projections.
The
problem of heights, which was traditionally approached separately,
gains a totally new approach. The study of geoids and, in
particular, the production of models that may provide precise
solutions to height differences.
Nowadays
we also see the need of a single reference vertical system,
consistent in nature and able to provide conceptual clarity
to the different existing systems of possible heights.
Astronomy
education has to be positively changed. Its aim is no longer
setting the observers’ coordinates; astronomic geodesy
has to provide the knowledge to understand satellite constellation
behavior, to transform universal coordinates into geocentric
coordinates, the concept of time and its measurement, etc.
Calculations
in geodesy have been completely changed. Available software
capabilities and specificity have simplified a powerful limitation.
University education should focus on developing the fundamentals
of ellipsoid mathematical calculation and on the proper use
of adequate software.
Adjustment
and compensation witness a similar reality. Least squares,
so thoroughly applied by experts to a limited number of problems
is today applicable to geodesy, photogrammetry, image referencing
systems, etc. It is convenient, therefore, to teach students
the fundamentals of it as well as the adequate use of the
information provided by this solution.
Some general
considerations.
We should finally highlight
the fact, noticeable in traditional bibliographies, that the
development of theory has paid attention to observation instruments
and calculation tools available in each period of time. This
resulted in wide scope developments which single aim was to,
from captured or surveyed data, calculate with required precision,
by means of tables, mechanical or manual calculators, abacus,
etc.
Can
we mention other issues? Of course not. It is a very well
known truth: training and education is more important than
mere information. Choices are to privilege the possibilities
provided by new technologies. Several problems that used to
be solved by complex, tortuous instrumentation and calculations
do have now simple, accessible solutions that students are
to know and learn.
Selecting
topics to incorporate or eliminate from the curricula is equally
important.
Knowledge
undergoes permanent change and new technologies crucially
urge us to update and upgrade education. As we said, a professional
cultural change is needed.
Not
only university education has to be updated and upgraded.
Professional training and post-graduate studies are also paramount.
Surveying education is to be seen as an ongoing process.
Technological
developments require research. Transferring information on
new technologies is not teaching to use them adequately and
creatively. To achieve this objective, we have to integrate
research and teaching, coordinate them and foster research
responsibilities on professors.
Bajar
texto (Tamaño
9KB)
|